The Most Expensive Losing Streak in Baseball
The Mets have the second-highest payroll in MLB and the third-worst start in franchise history. One of those facts was supposed to prevent the other.

Photo · Latest Headlines - The Athletic
$381 Million Worth of Questions
Somewhere in Chicago on Sunday, a sacrifice fly landed and the New York Mets lost their eleventh consecutive game. Swept by the Cubs. Swept for the third straight series. Sitting at 7-15, staring at the third-worst start in franchise history — all of it happening to a team that's spending $381 million to be here.
That number deserves a moment. Three hundred and eighty-one million dollars. Second-highest payroll in all of baseball. And what it bought, apparently, is this: a ninth-inning lead that evaporated, a Craig Kimbrel appearance that ended badly, and a Nico Hoerner sacrifice fly in the tenth that sent everyone home quiet.
The coverage across the board clocked the loss. ESPN had the box score mechanics. CBS Sports had the record. The Guardian had the payroll figure and the sting of irony baked right into the headline. The Athletic noted where this streak ranks in franchise lore. But here's what none of them quite said out loud: we don't actually know why this is happening, and neither do the Mets.
Nobody's Coming to Save Them
Manager Carlos Mendoza said after Sunday's game that eleven losses is a lot, no matter when it happens, and that nobody is going to feel sorry for them. He's right on both counts. The Athletic's framing — we can't feel sorry for ourselves — is the only honest posture available. Self-pity is a luxury you don't get to buy, even at $381 million.
But here's the tension that makes this story worth sitting with: the Mets aren't losing because they're cheap, or because they didn't try, or because the front office punted on the offseason. They built something that looked, on paper, like it should work. And then April happened, and it didn't, and now they're in the same position every confused, expensive, underperforming team eventually finds itself — staring at the numbers and realizing the numbers don't explain anything.
Money buys talent. It doesn't buy timing. It doesn't buy the particular kind of trust that holds a lineup together when the hits stop falling. It doesn't buy whatever invisible thing separates a team that claws back from one that watches a ninth-inning lead disappear in the Wrigley afternoon.
We talk about payroll like it's a prediction. The Mets are proof that it's just a bet.
Eleven games into a losing streak, the most expensive question in baseball is the simplest one: what exactly did we think we were building?
Keep reading sports.

The Giants Just Told You Everything About How They See the Future
Trading a three-time Pro Bowler for a top-ten pick isn't a rebuild. It's a confession.

The Coach Who Knows When to Read the Room
Steve Kerr didn't close a door — he told you exactly what he thinks is behind it.

The $3.9 Billion Question Nobody's Asking
The Padres just sold for a record-shattering sum, and the sport of baseball had almost nothing to do with it.
From the other desks.

Two Cities, Zero Cars, One Announcement
Tesla called it an expansion. The data called it something else.

The Bracelet Was Always the Point
Jaeger-LeCoultre's new Master Control isn't an update — it's an admission.

Free Means You're the Dataset Now
Atlassian stopped hiding what the free tier actually costs.