McLaren Bets on Fire
Abu Dhabi just spent £1.5 billion to keep combustion engines alive in Woking. That's not a contradiction — it's a statement.

Photo · Autocar RSS Feed
The most interesting thing about McLaren's coming-out party this summer isn't the concept car. It's the conviction behind it.
Autocar is reporting that McLaren will preview its first new model since the CYVN merger before the year is out — and that the road ahead involves multiple combustion-engined cars by 2030. No hedged hybrid-first strategy. No EV pivot dressed up as a transition plan. Internal combustion, plural, through the end of the decade.
That's a position worth sitting with.
What Abu Dhabi Is Actually Saying
CYVN Holdings is a state investment fund. Abu Dhabi is one of the world's largest oil producers. The narrative writes itself, and plenty of people will reach for it. But reducing this to petrostates propping up petrol engines misses the more interesting read.
The money — reportedly around £1.5 billion — is going into a British sports car brand that was genuinely on its knees. McLaren had been through financial restructuring, asset sales, and existential uncertainty. CYVN didn't buy a trophy. They bought a problem, merged it with Forseven, a start-up that had been developing vehicles in secret, and handed the keys to Nick Collins. That's not a vanity project. That's a bet.
The bet is this: there is still a market for driver-focused, combustion-powered sports cars, and it will still exist in 2030. Not as a legacy product. As a choice.
I think they're right.
The Overcorrection Nobody Talks About
The performance car industry spent the better part of five years in full electrification panic. Brands that built their identity on engine noise and mechanical feedback started announcing EV futures before they'd figured out what those futures actually looked like. Some of it was genuine conviction. A lot of it was regulatory anxiety dressed up as vision.
The consumer didn't fully follow. The ultra-wealthy buyer — McLaren's actual customer — turns out to be less ideologically committed to electrification than the industry assumed. They want what they always wanted: something that makes them feel something. The powertrain is secondary to that. It always was.
McLaren expanding beyond two-seat mid-engined supercars while staying combustion-focused isn't a step backward. It's a reading of the room that a lot of legacy brands got wrong.
What the Concept Has to Do
The reveal this summer is carrying real weight. Forseven's work has been invisible until now. Collins has been running a combined operation with no public product. The concept needs to answer the obvious question: what does a McLaren look like when it grows up?
The two-seat supercar formula made McLaren. It also boxed them in. Every model existed in roughly the same space — extraordinary, narrow, not for every occasion. The brand had depth of execution without breadth of relevance. If the new line genuinely expands the range, the concept has to show that expansion is coherent. That it still looks and feels like something only McLaren would make.
That's the hard part. Porsche spent decades learning how to grow without diluting. Ferrari is still navigating it. McLaren is starting from a much thinner base.
The combustion commitment buys them something, though. It gives them a clear identity in a market where identity is suddenly up for grabs. While everyone else is explaining their electrification roadmap, McLaren gets to talk about driving.
Summer can't come fast enough.
Keep reading cars.

The F40 Doesn't Care Who's Watching. That's the Problem.
Lewis Hamilton doing donuts in a Ferrari F40 through Tokyo is either the most authentic thing he's done in years, or proof that nothing is sacred anymore. The ambiguity is the whole story.

GM Didn't Just Bring Back the Camaro. It Brought Back the Idea.
Three RWD sedans, one platform, and a Buick that might be the most interesting car in the lineup.

Porsche Says the New 911 Will Be 'Particularly Fun.' The Bar It Set Is Terrifying.
When the car that invented the benchmark promises to raise it, you either believe them or you don't.
From the other desks.

Universal Genève Came Back With Everything. That's the Problem.
A relaunch this big isn't a statement of identity — it's a question about it.

The Name Came Back. The Question Is Whether the Watch Did.
Universal Genève is alive again. Breitling made sure of it. But resurrection and relevance aren't the same thing.

The Smartwatch Won. That's Why Nobody Wants One.
A TechRadar writer just said what the watch world has been quietly thinking for two years.